Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
<joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
> Andy [2].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@xxxxxxxxxx/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 5e653c2923fd ("mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")

What tree is that commit in?  Can we not just fold this in?