Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: Support 'protected-clocks' property

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-11-05 11:40:11)
> Certain firmware configurations "protect" clks and cause the entire
> system to reboot when a non-secure OS such as Linux tries to read or
> write protected clk registers. But other firmware configurations allow
> reading or writing the same registers, and they may actually require
> that the OS use the otherwise locked down clks. Support the
> 'protected-clocks' property by never registering these protected clks
> with the common clk framework. This way, when firmware is protecting
> these clks we won't have the chance to ever read or write these
> registers and take down the entire system.
> 
> Cc: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Applied to clk-next