Re: [PATCH 3/6] devfreq: add support for suspend/resume of a devfreq device
From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Thu Nov 22 2018 - 18:54:15 EST
Hi Lukasz,
I add one more comment about devfreq_resume_device().
On 2018ë 11ì 22ì 20:00, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/18 3:58 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2018ë 11ì 22ì 03:01, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>> The patch adds support for handling suspend/resume process.
>>> It uses atomic variables to make sure no race condition
>>> affects the process.
>>>
>>> The patch draws on Tobias Jakobi's work posted ~2 years ago, who tried to
>>> solve issue with devfreq device's frequency during suspend/resume.
>>> During the discussion on LKML some corner cases and comments appeared
>>> related to the design. This patch address them keeping in mind suggestions
>>> from Chanwoo Choi.
>>
>> Please remove the duplicate information about patch history.
>>
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> index cf9c643..7e09de8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> @@ -872,14 +872,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_devfreq_remove_device);
>>> */
>>> int devfreq_suspend_device(struct devfreq *devfreq)
>>> {
>>> - if (!devfreq)
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + int ret;
>>
>> Move 'ret' definition under 'if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {'
>> because 'ret' is used if suspend_freq isn't zero.
> Not only there, 6 lines above 'ret' is used for
> devfreq->governor->event_handler().
OK.
>>
>>> + unsigned long prev_freq;
>>> + u32 flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (!devfreq)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (devfreq->governor) {
>>> + ret = devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq,
>>> + DEVFREQ_GOV_SUSPEND, NULL);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - if (!devfreq->governor)
>>> - return 0;
>>> + if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {
>>> + if (atomic_inc_return(&devfreq->suspend_count) > 1)
>>> + return 0;
>>>
>>> - return devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq,
>>> - DEVFREQ_GOV_SUSPEND, NULL);
>>> + ret = devfreq_set_target(devfreq, devfreq->suspend_freq,
>>> + &prev_freq, flags);
>>
>> Remove the 'prev_freq' parameter.
> OK
>>
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + devfreq->resume_freq = prev_freq;
>>
>> As I commented on patch2, if devfreq_set_taget save the current frequency
>> to 'devfreq->resume_freq', this line is not needed.
> OK
>>
>>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_suspend_device);
>>>
>>> @@ -893,9 +912,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_suspend_device);
>>> */
>>> int devfreq_resume_device(struct devfreq *devfreq)
>>> {
>>> + int ret;
>>
>> Move 'ret' definition under 'if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {'
>> because 'ret' is used if suspend_freq isn't zero.
> OK
If you change the devfreq_resume_device() according to my new comment,
please ignore it.
>>
>>> + unsigned long prev_freq;
>>
>> Remove prev_freq variable which is not used on this function.
>> After calling devfreq_set_target, prev_freq is not used.
> OK
>>
>>> + u32 flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> if (!devfreq)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> + if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {
>>> + if (atomic_dec_return(&devfreq->suspend_count) >= 1)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + ret = devfreq_set_target(devfreq, devfreq->resume_freq,
>>> + &prev_freq, flags);
>>
>> Remove the 'prev_freq' parameter.
> OK
>>
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (!devfreq->governor)
>>> return 0;
Please change the code as following because you uses the following type
in the devfreq_suspend_device(). If there is any special issue, please
keep the same format in order to improve the readability.
if (devfreq->governor) {
ret = devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq,
DEVFREQ_GOV_RESUME, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> Regards,
> Lukasz Luba
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics