Re: [PATCH 0/7] ACPI HMAT memory sysfs representation

[Dave Hansen]

On 11/22/18 10:42 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Are we willing to go in the direction for inclusion of a new system
> call, subset of it appears on sysfs etc ? My primary concern is not
> how the attribute information appears on the sysfs but lack of it's
> completeness.

A new system call makes total sense to me.  I have the same concern
about the completeness of what's exposed in sysfs, I just don't see a
_route_ to completeness with sysfs itself.  Thus, the minimalist
approach as a first step.