Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] base/drivers/arch_topology: Default dmips-mhz if they are not set in DT

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Nov 26 2018 - 01:01:58 EST


On 23-11-18, 11:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 23/11/2018 11:04, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 22-11-18, 13:36, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> In the case of asymmetric SoC with the same micro-architecture, we
> >> have a group of CPUs with smaller OPPs than the other group. One
> >> example is the 96boards dragonboard 820c. There is no dmips/MHz
> >> difference between both groups, so no need to specify the values in
> >> the DT. Unfortunately, without these defined, there is no scaling
> >> capacity computation triggered, so we need to write
> >> 'capacity-dmips-mhz' for each CPU with the same value in order to
> >> force the scaled capacity computation.
> >>
> >> Fix this by setting a default capacity to SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, if no
> >> 'capacity-dmips-mhz' is defined in the DT.
> >
> > We aren't doing this anymore. You should rather explain that we just
> > allocate raw_capacity now and rest is left for
> > init_cpu_capacity_callback() to fix.
>
> What about?
>
> "In the case of asymmetric SoC with the same micro-architecture, we
> have a group of CPUs with smaller OPPs than the other group. One
> example is the 96boards dragonboard 820c. There is no dmips/MHz
> difference between both groups, so no need to specify the values in
> the DT. Unfortunately, without these defined, there is no scaling
> capacity computation triggered, so we need to write
> 'capacity-dmips-mhz' for each CPU with the same value in order to
> force the scaled capacity computation.
>
> In order to fix this situation, allocate 'raw_capacity' so the pointer
> is set and the init_cpu_capacity_callback() function can be called."

LGTM

--
viresh