Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation

From: Florian Weimer
Date: Mon Nov 26 2018 - 11:03:19 EST

Next message: Eddie James: "Re: [PATCH] fsi: occ: fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64"
In reply to: Mathieu Desnoyers: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation"
Next in thread: Rich Felker: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Mathieu Desnoyers:

> So let's make __rseq_abi and __rseq_refcount strong symbols then ?

Yes, please. (But I'm still not sure we need the reference counter.)

Thanks,
Florian

Next message: Eddie James: "Re: [PATCH] fsi: occ: fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64"
In reply to: Mathieu Desnoyers: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation"
Next in thread: Rich Felker: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]