Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf report: Display average IPC and IPC coverage per symbol

From: Jin, Yao
Date: Mon Nov 26 2018 - 22:52:14 EST




On 11/26/2018 5:53 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:40:54PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
index f96c005..94f62c8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "strlist.h"
#include <traceevent/event-parse.h>
#include "mem-events.h"
+#include "annotate.h"
#include <linux/kernel.h>
regex_t parent_regex;
@@ -422,6 +423,47 @@ struct sort_entry sort_srcline_to = {
.se_width_idx = HISTC_SRCLINE_TO,
};
+static int hist_entry__sym_ipc_snprintf(struct hist_entry *he, char *bf,
+ size_t size, unsigned int width)
+{
+
+ struct symbol *sym = he->ms.sym;
+ struct map *map = he->ms.map;
+ struct perf_evsel *evsel = hists_to_evsel(he->hists);
+ struct annotation *notes;
+ double ipc = 0.0, coverage = 0.0;
+ char tmp[64];
+
+ if (!sym)
+ return repsep_snprintf(bf, size, "%-*s", width, "-");
+
+ if (!sym->annotated &&
+ symbol__annotate2(sym, map, evsel, &annotation__default_options,
+ NULL) < 0) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ sym->annotated = true;

I don't like this being set in here.. please move it to
symbol__annotate2 or symbol__annotate, not sure which
one of these is the best fit


I have set this flag in symbol__annotate2 in v2.

+ notes = symbol__annotation(sym);
+
+ if (notes->hit_cycles)
+ ipc = notes->hit_insn / ((double)notes->hit_cycles);
+
+ if (notes->total_insn)
+ coverage = notes->cover_insn * 100.0 /
+ ((double)notes->total_insn);

missing { } for multiline code in 'if' condition


Fixed, thanks!

Thanks
Jin Yao

thanks,
jirka