Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] base/drivers/arch_topology: Default dmips-mhz if they are not set in DT
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Tue Nov 27 2018 - 03:31:57 EST
On 27/11/2018 04:57, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-11-18, 13:20, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt
>> index 84262cd..f53a3c9 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt
>> @@ -54,6 +54,12 @@ fall back to the default capacity value for every CPU. If cpufreq is not
>> available, final capacities are calculated by directly using capacity-dmips-
>> mhz values (normalized w.r.t. the highest value found while parsing the DT).
>>
>> +If capacity-dmips-mhz is not specified or if the parsing fails, the
>> +default capacity value will be computed against the highest frequency.
>> +When all CPUs have the same OPP, they will have the same capacity
>> +value otherwise the capacity will be scaled down for CPUs having lower
>> +frequencies.
>
> I know you added this based on Quentin's feedback, but I wonder if this is
> really required and if it is improving anything at all. This is what the
> documentation says currently without this patch:
>
> "
> capacity-dmips-mhz is an optional cpu node [1] property: u32 value
> representing CPU capacity expressed in normalized DMIPS/MHz. At boot time, the
> maximum frequency available to the cpu is then used to calculate the capacity
> value internally used by the kernel.
>
> capacity-dmips-mhz property is all-or-nothing: if it is specified for a cpu
> node, it has to be specified for every other cpu nodes, or the system will
> fall back to the default capacity value for every CPU. If cpufreq is not
> available, final capacities are calculated by directly using capacity-dmips-
> mhz values (normalized w.r.t. the highest value found while parsing the DT).
> "
>
> So it already clearly says two things:
> - If all CPUs don't have this property, we fallback to default capacity for
> every CPU.
> - And the OS may also normalize the capacity based on the maximum frequency.
>
> What more do we want to add here ?
I think what is new is the silver-gold platform. I agree the description
above gives us the information but in a condensed way. With this extra
paragraph we elaborate a bit and make it more clear for SMP/AMP systems.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog