Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/hyper-v: move synic/stimer control structures definitions to hyperv-tlfs.h

[Vitaly Kuznetsov]

Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>
> On a different note: how come all of the hyper-v structs are not marked
> with the âpacked" attribute?

"packed" should not be needed with proper padding; I vaguely remember
someone (from x86@?) arguing _against_ "packed".

-- 
Vitaly