[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Fix the xo parent in gpucc example

[Douglas Anderson]

In the bindings that landed for the gpucc we require that the XO clock
(one possible parent of the gpucc) be listed.  The code doesn't use
this yet--this is just to allow us to move toward the day when it does
use it.  What the code does do today is to hardcode the parent name to
"bi_tcxo".  That's all well and good.

...but the example in the bindings shows this clock mapping to the
clock "xo_board".  On the current sdm845.dtsi file the "xo_board"
clock is a fixed clock with an output name of "xo_board".  The clock
with the name "bi_tcxo" is actually provided by the RPMh Clock
Controller.  Presumably that's the one that was wanted.

Let's update the example to make this clearer.

Fixes: e431c92188a9 ("dt-bindings: clock: Introduce QCOM Graphics clock bindings")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.txt
index 9d0358cc08b4..4e5215ef1acd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.txt
@@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ Example:
 		#clock-cells = <1>;
 		#reset-cells = <1>;
 		#power-domain-cells = <1>;
-		clocks = <&xo_board>;
+		clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
 		clock-names = "xo";
 	};
-- 
2.20.0.rc0.387.gc7a69e6b6c-goog