On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:09:16PM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
In multi-master environment, this driver's master cannot know
exactly when a peer master sends data to this driver's slave so a
case can be happened that this master tries to send data through
the master_xfer function but slave data from peer master is still
being processed by this driver.
So, that I get this correct: your IP core cannot detect a bus busy state
when its own slave address is acessed? Well, I know HW can have bugs,
but I still wonder because a bus is busy as soon as another START has
been detected, independent of which device is going to be accessed.
Even if so, why can't you use a mutex to prevent any master_xfer while
slave_xfer is ongoing?
Shouldn't that be enough according to the above description? Why do you
need the delay? I might be missing something...
To prevent any state corruption in the case, this patch adds
checking code if any slave operation is ongoing and it waits up to
the bus timeout duration before starting a master_xfer operation.
Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
index 833b6b6a4c7e..30c3ab3a4844 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
@@ -115,6 +116,9 @@
/* 0x18 : I2CD Slave Device Address Register */
#define ASPEED_I2CD_DEV_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(6, 0)
+/* Busy checking */
+#define ASPEED_I2C_BUS_BUSY_CHECK_INTERVAL_US (10 * 1000)
+
enum aspeed_i2c_master_state {
ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE,
ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_START,
@@ -156,6 +160,8 @@ struct aspeed_i2c_bus {
int cmd_err;
/* Protected only by i2c_lock_bus */
int master_xfer_result;
+ /* Multi-master */
+ bool multi_master;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
struct i2c_client *slave;
enum aspeed_i2c_slave_state slave_state;
@@ -596,27 +602,44 @@ static irqreturn_t aspeed_i2c_bus_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
return irq_remaining ? IRQ_NONE : IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+static int aspeed_i2c_check_bus_busy(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus)
+{
+ unsigned long timeout;
+
+ if (bus->multi_master) {
+ might_sleep();
+ /* Initialize it only when multi_master is set */
+ timeout = jiffies + bus->adap.timeout;
+ }
+
+ for (;;) {
+ if (!(readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) &
+ ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_BUSY_STS))
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
+ if (bus->slave_state == ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP)
+#endif
+ return 0;
+ if (!bus->multi_master)
+ break;
+ if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
+ break;
+ usleep_range((ASPEED_I2C_BUS_BUSY_CHECK_INTERVAL_US >> 2) + 1,
+ ASPEED_I2C_BUS_BUSY_CHECK_INTERVAL_US);
+ }
+
+ return aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);
+}
+
static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
{
struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
unsigned long time_left, flags;
- int ret = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
- bus->cmd_err = 0;
-
- /* If bus is busy, attempt recovery. We assume a single master
- * environment.
- */
- if (readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) & ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_BUSY_STS) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
- ret = aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
- }
+ if (aspeed_i2c_check_bus_busy(bus))
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
bus->cmd_err = 0;
bus->msgs = msgs;
bus->msgs_index = 0;
@@ -827,7 +850,9 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_init(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus,
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "multi-master"))
+ if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "multi-master"))
+ bus->multi_master = true;
+ else
fun_ctrl_reg |= ASPEED_I2CD_MULTI_MASTER_DIS;
/* Enable Master Mode */
--
2.19.1