Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add support for using external DMA devices

From: Chunyan Zhang
Date: Thu Nov 29 2018 - 05:46:54 EST

Next message: kbuild test robot: "fs/ubifs/tnc.c:493: undefined reference to `ubifs_bad_hash'"
Previous message: Claudiu.Beznea: "Re: [RFC PATCH] net: macb: Apply RXUBR workaround only to versions with errata"
In reply to: Adrian Hunter: "Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add support for using external DMA devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 18:41, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 29/11/18 11:44 AM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 17:25, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 29/11/18 8:07 AM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> >>> Some standard SD host controllers can support both external dma
> >>> controllers as well as ADMA/SDMA in which the SD host controller
> >>> acts as DMA master. TI's omap controller is the case as an example.
> >>>
> >>> Currently the generic SDHCI code supports ADMA/SDMA integrated in
> >>> the host controller but does not have any support for external DMA
> >>> controllers implemented using dmaengine, meaning that custom code is
> >>> needed for any systems that use an external DMA controller with SDHCI.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 14 ++++
> >>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 8 ++
> >>> 3 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> >>> index 1b58739..4183f43 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -969,6 +969,7 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_XENON
> >>> config MMC_SDHCI_OMAP
> >>> tristate "TI SDHCI Controller Support"
> >>> depends on MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM && OF
> >>> + select MMC_SDHCI_EXTERNAL_DMA if DMA_ENGINE
> >>> help
> >>> This selects the Secure Digital Host Controller Interface (SDHCI)
> >>> support present in TI's DRA7 SOCs. The controller supports
> >>> @@ -977,3 +978,16 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_OMAP
> >>> If you have a controller with this interface, say Y or M here.
> >>>
> >>> If unsure, say N.
> >>> +
> >>> +config MMC_SDHCI_EXTERNAL_DMA
> >>> + bool "Support external DMA in standard SD host controller"
> >>> + depends on MMC_SDHCI
> >>> + depends on DMA_ENGINE
> >>> + help
> >>> + This is an option for using external DMA device via dmaengine
> >>> + framework.
> >>> +
> >>> + If you have a controller which support using external DMA device
> >>> + for data transfer, can say Y.
> >>> +
> >>> + If unsure, say N.
> >>
> >> So if you are going to select this, then you don't need the prompt or help
> >> anymore i.e.
> >>
> >> config MMC_SDHCI_EXTERNAL_DMA
> >> bool
> >>
> >>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> >>> index 99bdae5..ad7cc80 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> >>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >>> */
> >>>
> >>> #include <linux/delay.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> >>> #include <linux/ktime.h>
> >>> #include <linux/highmem.h>
> >>> #include <linux/io.h>
> >>> @@ -1309,6 +1310,162 @@ static void sdhci_del_timer(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> >>> del_timer(&host->timer);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_EXTERNAL_DMA)
> >>> +static int sdhci_external_dma_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> >>> +
> >>> + host->tx_chan = dma_request_chan(mmc->parent, "tx");
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(host->tx_chan)) {
> >>> + ret = PTR_ERR(host->tx_chan);
> >>> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >>> + pr_warn("Failed to request TX DMA channel.\n");
> >>> + host->tx_chan = NULL;
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + host->rx_chan = dma_request_chan(mmc->parent, "rx");
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(host->rx_chan)) {
> >>> + if (host->tx_chan) {
> >>> + dma_release_channel(host->tx_chan);
> >>> + host->tx_chan = NULL;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = PTR_ERR(host->rx_chan);
> >>> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >>> + pr_warn("Failed to request RX DMA channel.\n");
> >>> + host->rx_chan = NULL;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static inline struct dma_chan *
> >>> +sdhci_external_dma_channel(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE ? host->tx_chan : host->rx_chan;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int sdhci_external_dma_setup(struct sdhci_host *host,
> >>> + struct mmc_command *cmd)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int ret, i;
> >>> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc;
> >>> + struct mmc_data *data = cmd->data;
> >>> + struct dma_chan *chan;
> >>> + struct dma_slave_config cfg;
> >>> + dma_cookie_t cookie;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!host->mapbase)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!data)
> >>> + return 0;
> >>
> >> It would read better if the above 2 if-statements were the other way around i.e.
> >>
> >> if (!data)
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> if (!host->mapbase)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> >>> +
> >>> + cfg.src_addr = host->mapbase + SDHCI_BUFFER;
> >>> + cfg.dst_addr = host->mapbase + SDHCI_BUFFER;
> >>> + cfg.src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
> >>> + cfg.dst_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
> >>> + cfg.src_maxburst = data->blksz / 4;
> >>> + cfg.dst_maxburst = data->blksz / 4;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Sanity check: all the SG entries must be aligned by block size. */
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < data->sg_len; i++) {
> >>> + if ((data->sg + i)->length % data->blksz)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + chan = sdhci_external_dma_channel(host, data);
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = dmaengine_slave_config(chan, &cfg);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(chan, data->sg, data->sg_len,
> >>> + mmc_get_dma_dir(data),
> >>> + DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> >>> + if (!desc)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> + desc->callback = NULL;
> >>> + desc->callback_param = NULL;
> >>> +
> >>> + cookie = dmaengine_submit(desc);
> >>> + if (cookie < 0)
> >>> + ret = cookie;
> >>> +
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void sdhci_external_dma_release(struct sdhci_host *host)
> >>> +{
> >>> + if (host->tx_chan) {
> >>> + dma_release_channel(host->tx_chan);
> >>> + host->tx_chan = NULL;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (host->rx_chan) {
> >>> + dma_release_channel(host->rx_chan);
> >>> + host->rx_chan = NULL;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + sdhci_switch_external_dma(host, false);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void sdhci_external_dma_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host,
> >>> + struct mmc_command *cmd)
> >>> +{
> >>> + if (sdhci_external_dma_setup(host, cmd)) {
> >>> + sdhci_external_dma_release(host);
> >>> + pr_err("%s: Failed to setup external DMA, switch to the DMA/PIO which standard SDHCI provides.\n",
> >>> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + /* Prepare for using external dma */
> >>> + host->flags |= SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + sdhci_prepare_data(host, cmd);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void sdhci_external_dma_pre_transfer(struct sdhci_host *host,
> >>> + struct mmc_command *cmd)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct dma_chan *chan;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (cmd->opcode != MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT && cmd->data) {
> >>
> >> MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT doesn't have data so that part is not needed
> >
> > Didn't get you here.
> > This is for other packets except MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT.
> >
>
> MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT is not a data transfer command, so cmd->data == NULL anyway.

Oh, got you.
"if (cmd->data)" is enough here :)

Thank you,
Chunyan

Next message: kbuild test robot: "fs/ubifs/tnc.c:493: undefined reference to `ubifs_bad_hash'"
Previous message: Claudiu.Beznea: "Re: [RFC PATCH] net: macb: Apply RXUBR workaround only to versions with errata"
In reply to: Adrian Hunter: "Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add support for using external DMA devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]