Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: meson: add main controller clock input

[Jerome Brunet]

On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 15:43 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2018-11-29 08:45:23)
> > Add the clock input of the main clock controller
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,gxbb-clkc.txt | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,gxbb-clkc.txt 
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,gxbb-clkc.txt
> > index e950599566a9..79454869f96d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,gxbb-clkc.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,gxbb-clkc.txt
> > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ Required Properties:
> >                 "amlogic,gxbb-clkc" for GXBB SoC,
> >                 "amlogic,gxl-clkc" for GXL and GXM SoC,
> >                 "amlogic,axg-clkc" for AXG SoC.
> > +- clocks: phandle to the input clock of the controller, presumably the
> > +         platform xtal.
> 
> Any reason to not have clock-names? 

Not really, I did not bother because there was only one input clock.
I can easily fix this

> I'd prefer to have them because then
> we can easily hook up providers with their parents based on strings. I
> suppose we'll have to support both modes of strings and numbers for
> connections, but that may be more for legacy reasons that could be
> avoided here if a clock-names property existed.
> 
> >  
> >  - #clock-cells: should be 1.
> >