Re: [PATCH 0/3] System call table generation support

From: Firoz Khan
Date: Fri Nov 30 2018 - 04:41:02 EST

Next message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/ast: Fix connector leak during driver unload"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm: msm: Replace dma_map_sg with dma_sync_sg*"
In reply to: Satheesh Rajendran: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] System call table generation support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Satheesh,

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 12:32, Satheesh Rajendran
<sathnaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:48:16PM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
> > Hi Sathish,
> >
> > Thanks for your email.
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 12:05, Satheesh Rajendran
> > <sathnaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 02:02:57PM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
> > > > The purpose of this patch series is:
> > > > 1. We can easily add/modify/delete system call by changing entry
> > > > in syscall.tbl file. No need to manually edit many files.
> > > >
> > > > 2. It is easy to unify the system call implementation across all
> > > > the architectures.
> > > >
> > > > The system call tables are in different format in all architecture
> > > > and it will be difficult to manually add or modify the system calls
> > > > in the respective files manually. To make it easy by keeping a script
> > > > and which'll generate the header file and syscall table file so this
> > > > change will unify them across all architectures.
> > > >
> > > > syscall.tbl contains the list of available system calls along with
> > > > system call number and corresponding entry point. Add a new system
> > > > call in this architecture will be possible by adding new entry in
> > > > the syscall.tbl file.
> > > >
> > > > Adding a new table entry consisting of:
> > > > - System call number.
> > > > - ABI.
> > > > - System call name.
> > > > - Entry point name.
> > > > - Compat entry name, if required.
> > > >
> > > > ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does exist the similar support. I
> > > > leverage their implementation to come up with a generic solution.
> > > >
> > > > I have done the same support for work for alpha, m68k, microblaze,
> > > > ia64, mips, parisc, sh, sparc, and xtensa. But I started sending
> > > > the patch for one architecuture for review. Below mentioned git
> > > > repository contains more details.
> > > > Git repo:- https://github.com/frzkhn/system_call_table_generator/
> > > >
> > > > Finally, this is the ground work for solving the Y2038 issue. We
> > > > need to add/change two dozen of system calls to solve Y2038 issue.
> > > > So this patch series will help to easily modify from existing
> > > > system call to Y2038 compatible system calls.
> > > >
> > > > I started working system call table generation on 4.17-rc1. I used
> > > > marcin's script - https://github.com/hrw/syscalls-table to generate
> > > > the syscall.tbl file. And this will be the input to the system call
> > > > table generation script. But there are couple system call got add
> > > > in the latest rc release. If run Marcin's script on latest release,
> > > > It will generate a new syscall.tbl. But I still use the old file -
> > > > syscall.tbl and once all review got over I'll update syscall.tbl
> > > > alone w.r.to the tip of the kernel. The impact of this thing, few
> > > > of the system call won't work.
> > > >
> > > > Firoz Khan (3):
> > > > powerpc: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
> > > > powerpc: Add system call table generation support
> > > > powerpc: uapi header and system call table file generation
> > > >
> > > > arch/powerpc/Makefile | 3 +
> > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild | 3 +
> > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h | 3 +-
> > > > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 2 +
> > > > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 391 +---------------------------
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile | 3 +-
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_table_32.S | 9 +
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_table_64.S | 17 ++
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/Makefile | 51 ++++
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 378 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 372 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscallhdr.sh | 37 +++
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscalltbl.sh | 38 +++
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/systbl.S | 50 ----
> > > > 14 files changed, 916 insertions(+), 441 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_table_32.S
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_table_64.S
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/Makefile
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscallhdr.sh
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscalltbl.sh
> > > > delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/systbl.S
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch series failed to boot in IBM Power8 box with below base commit and built with ppc64le_defconfig,
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git/commit/?h=merge&id=183cbf93be88d1a4fb572e27b1e08aa0ad85
> >
> > I think you are applied some old patch series. Could you please
> > perform the boot test on powerpc v3 which I have sent few hour before.
>
> Hi Firoz,
>
> Looks like I chose a wrong mail to reply, but did test with v3 series itself.

Thanks for the update. I'll have look into it and update you asap.

Firoz

>
> _v3,4_4__powerpc_generate_uapi_header_and_system_call_table_files_mbox_merge
>
> Thanks,
> -Satheesh.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Firoz
> >
> > >
> > > Complete boot log attached.
> > >
> > >
> > > [ 1.577383] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, no debug enabled
> > > [ 1.581550] Bad kernel stack pointer 6e690000 at c000000000e2ceec
> > > [ 1.581558] Oops: Bad kernel stack pointer, sig: 6 [#1]
> > > [ 1.581562] LE SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV
> > > [ 1.581567] Modules linked in:
> > > [ 1.581572] CPU: 3 PID: 1937 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 4.20.0-rc4-gd35c78239 #1
> > > [ 1.581577] NIP: c000000000e2ceec LR: c00000000000b9e4 CTR: c000000000e2cee0
> > > [ 1.581582] REGS: c0000007ffe77d30 TRAP: 0e40 Not tainted (4.20.0-rc4-gd35c78239)
> > > [ 1.581586] MSR: 9000000000009033 <SF,HV,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48024488 XER: 00000000
> > > [ 1.5815
> > > 94] CFAR: c00000000000b9e0 IRQMASK: c0000000014d1bd8
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR00: 00000000000011e0 000000006e690000 c000000001498900 ffffffffffffff9c
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR04: c00000006ecb0ff8 0000000000080000 0000000000000000 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR08: 0000000000000000 c000001e5104fe90 0000000000000000 c000000000c30ff8
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR12: c000000000e2cee0 c0000007ffffd800 4f4c5f4543415254 00007fffb55927d0
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR16: 00007fffb55bfbf0 00007fffc087b160 c000000065b70ff8 00007fffc087b5c8
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR20: 000000000000000d 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000
> > > 0000
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR24: 000000012b660d79 0000000000000000 00007fffb55c0000 0000000000000000
> > > [ 1.581594] GPR28: 00007fffb55c1110 0000000000000001 00007fffb55c1050 00007fffc087a880
> > > [ 1.58
> > > 1637] NIP [c000000000e2ceec] str_spec.65753+0x147da0/0x1f1c5c
> > > [ 1.581643] LR [c00000000000b9e4] system_call+0x5c/0x70
> > > [ 1.581646] Call Trace:
> > > [ 1.581648] Instruction dump:
> > > [ 1.581652]
> > > XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
> > > [ 1.581657] XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
> > > [ 1.581664] ---[ end trace 37e56b4
> > > 4979b6992 ]---
> > > [ 1.582355]
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > -Satheesh.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 1.9.1
> > > >
> >
>

Next message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/ast: Fix connector leak during driver unload"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm: msm: Replace dma_map_sg with dma_sync_sg*"
In reply to: Satheesh Rajendran: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] System call table generation support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]