Re: [PATCH 7/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]_NEW

[Deepa Dinamani]

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:33 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 12:28 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > > +       if (type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW || type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
> > > > > +               sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
> > > > > +       else
> > > > > +               sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > if adding a boolean whether the socket uses new or old-style
> > > > timestamps, perhaps fail hard if a process tries to set a new-style
> > > > option while an old-style is already set and vice versa. Also include
> > > > SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW as it toggles the same option.
> >
> > I do not think this is a problem.
> > Consider this example, if there is a user application with updated
> > socket timestamps is linking into a library that is yet to be updated.
>
> Also consider applications that do not use libraries.

Arnd and I talked about this.
We thought that the new options should behave like the already
existing options. The patch already does this.
Eg: Today if we set SO_TIMESTAMP and then try to switch to
SO_TIMESTAMPNS then there is no fail.

Do you still want a hard fail?

-Deepa