Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: nforce2: Remove meaningless return

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:26 PM Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In a function whose return type is void, returning on the last line is
> not required.So remove it.Also move the module declaration to the end.

The last piece is not reflected by the subject.

Also, why do you move the MODULE_ stuff around at all?

>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c | 11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c
> index dbf82f36d270..ccff1f2a7c25 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c
> @@ -47,10 +47,6 @@ static int fid;
>  static int min_fsb;
>  static int max_fsb;
>
> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Sebastian Witt <se.witt@xxxxxxx>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("nForce2 FSB changing cpufreq driver");
> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -
>  module_param(fid, int, 0444);
>  module_param(min_fsb, int, 0444);
>
> @@ -123,8 +119,6 @@ static void nforce2_write_pll(int pll)
>         /* Now write the value in all 64 registers */
>         for (temp = 0; temp <= 0x3f; temp++)
>                 pci_write_config_dword(nforce2_dev, NFORCE2_PLLREG, pll);
> -
> -       return;
>  }
>
>  /**
> @@ -436,6 +430,9 @@ static void __exit nforce2_exit(void)
>         cpufreq_unregister_driver(&nforce2_driver);
>  }
>
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sebastian Witt <se.witt@xxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("nForce2 FSB changing cpufreq driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +
>  module_init(nforce2_init);
>  module_exit(nforce2_exit);
> -
> --
> 2.17.0
>