Re: [PATCH] printk: don't unconditionally shortcut print_time()

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (12/04/18 19:06), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/12/04 11:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Can we please have something better than 'f'?
>
> OK. To pass 80 column limit, one line increased. ;-)

Ah, so that was the reason :)

[..]

> To close this race, get a snapshot value of printk_time and pass it to
> SYSLOG_ACTION_READ, SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_ALL, SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD and
> kmsg_dump_get_buffer().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>

	-ss