Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: convert to DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj
Date: Wed Dec 05 2018 - 03:56:32 EST
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:47 AM Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:39 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:58 PM Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > $ git remote set-branches --add origin for-next
> > > > $ git br -vv
> > > > * for-next 651022382c7f [origin/for-next] Linux 4.20-rc1
> > >
> > > Here is the problem,
> > >
> > > For a few days at least we have
> > > 4ecd94b8e13b (HEAD -> for-next) platform/x86: dell-laptop: Mark
> > > expected switch fall-throughs
>
> > Where can I find the correct git repositoryï
>
> I think even old address still exists:
> http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git
>
> > I haven't found the correct one for a long time,
> > which include the commit(4ecd94b8e13b ) you said.
>
> And newest one is available via
> http://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git
>
> http://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/commit/4ecd94b8e13b014a28be48c94f751fb62f7c749e
>
> Though it's already advanced to contain new portion of accepted
> patches (doesn't matter for you, because they don't touch file in
> question).
Hi Andy, i was thinking of having it split into two patches as it touches
two unrelated files. What is your opinion?
Functionality wise, it looks good to me.
>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
--
Best Regards,
Rajneesh