Re: [PATCH linux-next v3 6/7] ASoC: rsnd: add avb clocks

[Kuninori Morimoto]

Hi Jiada

> There are AVB Counter Clocks in ADG, each clock has 12bits integral
> and 8 bits fractional dividers which operates with S0D1Ï clock.
> 
> This patch registers 8 AVB Counter Clocks when clock-cells of
> rcar_sound node is 2,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---


> +static void clk_avb_div_write(struct rsnd_adg *adg, u32 data, unsigned int idx)
(snip)
> +static u32 clk_avb_div_read(struct rsnd_adg *adg, unsigned int idx)

As I mentioned before, I think we can avoid confusable parameter by

	static void clk_avb_div_write(struct clk_avb *avb, u32 data)
	static u32 clk_avb_div_read(struct clk_avb)	

	div = clk_avb_div_read(avb);
	clk_avb_div_write(avb, val | div);

> +static struct clk *clk_register_avb(struct device *dev, struct rsnd_adg *adg,
> +				    unsigned int id, spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	struct clk_init_data init;
> +	struct clk_avb *avb;
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +	char name[8];
> +	const char *parent_name;
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(adg->clkadg))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);

I think adg->clkadg will never hit to IS_ERR().
It will have NULL or correct pointer.

	clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "adg");
	if (!IS_ERR(clk))
		adg->clkadg = clk;

And this "adg" clock is strange.
see below

> +	avb = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*avb), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!avb)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	parent_name = __clk_get_name(adg->clkadg);

This parent_name is very strange to me.
AVB parent clk is "AUDIO_CLK_A/B/C/I" (= clk_a/b/c/i in this driver)
or "AUDIO_CLK_OUT_A/B/C/D" (= audio_clkout/1/2/3 in this driver).
And we don't have "adg" clock.
Please double check it.

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto