Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mmc: mmci: send stop command if sbc error issue

[Ludovic BARRE]

On 12/5/18 3:23 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 10:42, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 7 November 2018 at 10:30, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.Barre@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Refer to "4.15 set block count command" of sd specification:
> > > Host needs to issue CMD12 if any error is detected in
> > > the CMD18 and CMD25 operations.
> > >
> > > In sbc case, the data->stop is fill by framework.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 5 ++---
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> > > index 82bab35..13fa640 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> > > @@ -1190,11 +1190,10 @@ mmci_data_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data,
> > >                          /* The error clause is handled above, success! */
> > >                          data->bytes_xfered = data->blksz * data->blocks;
> > >
> > > -               if (!data->stop || host->mrq->sbc) {
> > > +               if (!data->stop || (host->mrq->sbc && !data->error))
> > >                          mmci_request_end(host, data->mrq);
> > > -               } else {
> > > +               else
> > >                          mmci_start_command(host, data->stop, 0);
> >
> > This looks correct to me!
> >
> > Although, just wanted to double check that you tested this for a case
> > where we have host->mrq->sbc set and got an error in data->error? I
> > guess it can be tricky, so I was thinking of manually trying to
> > instruct the code, to set an error in data->error, at some point to
> > trigger this code. That would at least give us some confidence that it
> > works as expected.
>
> I did some manual tests to trigger the error path. As far as I can
> tell, it works as expected and I observes that the core is able to
> recover and re-send the request.

Ulf, very thanks for the tests, and sorry for my busy status.
I will send as soon as possible the 2/2 with your recommendation (I will 
more spare time for upstream)

> [...]
>
> So, I have added my tested-by tag and applied this for next. Thanks!
>
> In regards to patch2/2 I am awaiting your update.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe