Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] perf cs-etm: Support for NO_SYNC packet

[leo . yan]

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:48:45AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:

[...]

> > So I think there still have some difference between TRACE_ON and
> > NO_SYNC packets, TRACE_ON packet indicates the start of trace and it's
> > also possible caused by tracing discontinuity; NO_SYNC packets usually
> > caused by an unsynchronised state.  But both of them presents
> > discontinuity in perf trace data.
> >
> > I prefer to use two different packet types to present them, this can
> > let the code to be more readable and easier to be maintained later.
> 
> Absolutely.  Make sure to get to the bottom of the story with Mike
> and/or Robert before sending your next patchset.

Sure, will sync with Mike/Rob.

Thanks,
Leo Yan