Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

From: yuankuiz
Date: Thu Dec 06 2018 - 02:22:58 EST


Hi,

Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
alrm_time : 00:00:00
alrm_date : 1970-01-01
alarm_IRQ : no
alrm_pending : no

to:
alarm time : 00:00:00
alarm date : 1970-01-01
alarm IRQ : no
alarm pending : no

Thanks,
BR//John Zhao

On 2018-12-04 05:29 PM, yuankuiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,

From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b

Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as
"alrm_" by printing converted from the struct
name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the
"alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this
dumping?

Signed-off-by: John Zhao <yuankuiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
index a9dd921..d4a3c91 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)

err = rtc_read_alarm(rtc, &alrm);
if (err == 0) {
- seq_printf(seq, "alrm_time\t: ");
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm time\t: ");
if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_hour <= 24)
seq_printf(seq, "%02d:", alrm.time.tm_hour);
else
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
else
seq_printf(seq, "**\n");

- seq_printf(seq, "alrm_date\t: ");
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm date\t: ");
if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_year <= 200)
seq_printf(seq, "%04d-", alrm.time.tm_year + 1900);
else
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
seq_printf(seq, "%02d\n", alrm.time.tm_mday);
else
seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
- seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm IRQ\t: %s\n",
alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no");
- seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm pending\t: %s\n",
alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no");
seq_printf(seq, "update IRQ enabled\t: %s\n",
(rtc->uie_rtctimer.enabled) ? "yes" : "no");