Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] microblaze: prefer memblock API returning virtual address

[Mike Rapoport]

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:29:40PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 03. 12. 18 16:47, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
> > then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
> > function that returns a virtual address.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/microblaze/mm/init.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
> > index b17fd8a..44f4b89 100644
> > --- a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
> > @@ -363,8 +363,9 @@ void __init *early_get_page(void)
> >  	 * Mem start + kernel_tlb -> here is limit
> >  	 * because of mem mapping from head.S
> >  	 */
> > -	return __va(memblock_alloc_base(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE,
> > -				memory_start + kernel_tlb));
> > +	return memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE,
> > +				MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT, memory_start + kernel_tlb,
> > +				NUMA_NO_NODE);
> >  }
> >  
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> > 
> 
> I can't see any issue with functionality when this patch is applied.
> If you want me to take this via my tree please let me know.

I thought to route this via mmotm tree.

> Otherwise:
> 
> Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> -- 
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
> U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP/Versal SoCs
> 
> 




-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.