Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/fault: Streamline the fault error_code decoder some more

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thatâs why I suggested âread,â in lowercase, for reads.  Other than 
> that, most of the unset bits are uninteresting. An OOPS is so likely to 
> be a kernel fault that itâs barely worth mentioning, and I even added a 
> whole separate diagnostic for user oopses.  Similarly, I donât think we 
> need to remind the reader that an oops wasnât an SGX error or that it 
> wasnât a PK error.  So I think my idea highlights the interesting bits 
> and avoids distraction from the uninteresting bits.

Ok - all good points.

Thanks,

	Ingo