Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add power-domain bindings for Q6V5

From: Sibi Sankar
Date: Thu Dec 06 2018 - 12:44:41 EST


Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for the review!

On 2018-12-06 22:28, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Tue 20 Nov 13:08 PST 2018, Sibi Sankar wrote:

Add power-domain bindings for Q6V5 MSS on SDM845 SoCs.


Thanks Sibi,

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Add dt-binding corresponding to https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10586893/
(remoteproc: q6v5: Add support to vote for rpmh power domains)

.../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
index 14947562bc67..bd9f4882fcf0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
@@ -75,6 +75,17 @@ on the Qualcomm Hexagon core.
Definition: reference to the regulators to be held on behalf of the
booting of the Hexagon core

+- power-domains:
+ Usage: required
+ Value type: <phandle>
+ Definition: reference to the cx, mx and mss power-domains to be held on
+ behalf of the booting the Hexagon core

This should mention that these are the domains for SDM845, as the list
seems to differ somewhat between platforms. Please also define the
requirements for MSM8996 (cx & mx) here, while you're at it.

Let's also make sure it includes the "load_state", for SDM845.


I'll list the power domains per SoC in the next respin

Regards,
Bjorn

+
+- power-domain-names:
+ Usage: required
+ Value type: <stringlist>
+ Definition: must be "cx", "mx", "mss"
+
- qcom,smem-states:
Usage: required
Value type: <phandle>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


--
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.