Re: [PATCH v3] mtd: spinand: Fix ECC status and OOB layout for Toshiba TC58CVG2S0H

From: Schrempf Frieder
Date: Fri Dec 07 2018 - 04:31:53 EST


Hi MiquÃl,

On 07.12.18 09:00, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Schrempf, ClÃment,
>
> Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 3 Dec 2018
> 08:01:38 +0000:
>
>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> When reading the status of the on-chip ECC, the Toshiba chip returns
>> two different states for reporting corrected bitflips. We should check
>> for both of them.
>>
>> Also return the free OOB bytes as one contiguous area, instead of
>> multiple sections.
>>
>> Suggested-by: ClÃment PÃron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: ClÃment PÃron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes for v3:
>> ===============
>> * Add Acked-by
>> * Add comment for BBM in OOB layout
>>
>> Changes for v2:
>> ===============
>> * Remove the changes to the ECC bytes in the OOB layout
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c
>> index 294bcf6..0812655 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <linux/mtd/spinand.h>
>>
>> #define SPINAND_MFR_TOSHIBA 0x98
>> +#define TOSH_STATUS_ECC_HAS_BITFLIPS_T (3 << 4)
>>
>> static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants,
>> SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
>> @@ -33,19 +34,18 @@ static int tc58cvg2s0h_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> region->offset = 128 + 16 * section;
>> region->length = 16;
>>
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int tc58cvg2s0h_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> struct mtd_oob_region *region)
>> {
>> - if (section > 7)
>> + if (section > 0)
>> return -ERANGE;
>>
>> - region->offset = 2 + 16 * section;
>> - region->length = 14;
>> -
>> + /* 2 bytes reserved for BBM */
>> + region->offset = 2;
>> + region->length = 126;
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static int tc58cvg2s0h_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>> return -EBADMSG;
>>
>> case STATUS_ECC_HAS_BITFLIPS:
>> + case TOSH_STATUS_ECC_HAS_BITFLIPS_T:
>> /*
>> * Let's try to retrieve the real maximum number of bitflips
>> * in order to avoid forcing the wear-leveling layer to move
>
> If you don't mind, I would like to squash this with the original patch.
> What about also adding Clement's Acked-by to it?

Sure, you can squash this with the original patch. And I guess adding
ClÃment's Acked-by would be appropriate, too.

Thanks,
Frieder