Re: [PATCH 1/8] Input: tm2-touchkey: Add support for midas touchkey

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi PaweÅ,

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:58:04AM +0100, PaweÅ Chmiel wrote:
> From: Simon Shields <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The touchkey on midas boards is almost identical.
> The only real difference is that it uses the same register for both
> keycode and base.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Shields <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: PaweÅ Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/input/keyboard/tm2-touchkey.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/tm2-touchkey.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/tm2-touchkey.c
> index abc266e40e17..37a5ced24009 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/tm2-touchkey.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/tm2-touchkey.c
> @@ -22,12 +22,13 @@
>  #include <linux/leds.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  
> -#define TM2_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME		"tm2-touchkey"
> -#define TM2_TOUCHKEY_KEYCODE_REG	0x03
> -#define TM2_TOUCHKEY_BASE_REG		0x00
> +#define TM2_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME "tm2-touchkey"
> +#define MIDAS_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME "midas-touchkey"

I am not sure why we need to bother with name changes... We can get to
compatible if it is that interesting, but other than that it seems
only complicate things. Also, you use MIDAS_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME in only
one place and open-code it in others.

> +
>  #define TM2_TOUCHKEY_CMD_LED_ON		0x10
>  #define TM2_TOUCHKEY_CMD_LED_OFF	0x20
>  #define TM2_TOUCHKEY_BIT_PRESS_EV	BIT(3)
> @@ -40,12 +41,31 @@ enum {
>  	TM2_TOUCHKEY_KEY_BACK,
>  };
>  
> +struct touchkey_variant {
> +	const char *name;
> +	u8 keycode_reg;
> +	u8 base_reg;
> +};
> +
>  struct tm2_touchkey_data {
>  	struct i2c_client *client;
>  	struct input_dev *input_dev;
>  	struct led_classdev led_dev;
>  	struct regulator *vdd;
>  	struct regulator_bulk_data regulators[2];
> +	struct touchkey_variant *variant;

	const struct touchkey_variant *variant;

> +};
> +
> +static struct touchkey_variant tm2_touchkey_variant = {

static const

> +	.name = "tm2-touchkey",
> +	.keycode_reg = 0x03,
> +	.base_reg = 0x00,
> +};
> +
> +static struct touchkey_variant midas_touchkey_variant = {

static const

> +	.name = "midas-touchkey",
> +	.keycode_reg = 0x00,
> +	.base_reg = 0x00,
>  };
>  
>  static void tm2_touchkey_led_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *led_dev,
> @@ -66,7 +86,7 @@ static void tm2_touchkey_led_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *led_dev,
>  
>  	regulator_set_voltage(touchkey->vdd, volt, volt);
>  	i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(touchkey->client,
> -				  TM2_TOUCHKEY_BASE_REG, data);
> +				  touchkey->variant->base_reg, data);
>  }
>  
>  static int tm2_touchkey_power_enable(struct tm2_touchkey_data *touchkey)
> @@ -99,7 +119,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tm2_touchkey_irq_handler(int irq, void *devid)
>  	int key;
>  
>  	data = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(touchkey->client,
> -					TM2_TOUCHKEY_KEYCODE_REG);
> +					touchkey->variant->keycode_reg);
>  	if (data < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&touchkey->client->dev,
>  			"failed to read i2c data: %d\n", data);
> @@ -153,6 +173,9 @@ static int tm2_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	touchkey->client = client;
>  	i2c_set_clientdata(client, touchkey);
>  
> +	touchkey->variant = (struct touchkey_variant *)


Is cast really needed?

> +		of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> +
>  	touchkey->regulators[0].supply = "vcc";
>  	touchkey->regulators[1].supply = "vdd";
>  	error = devm_regulator_bulk_get(&client->dev,
> @@ -187,7 +210,7 @@ static int tm2_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	touchkey->input_dev->name = TM2_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME;
> +	touchkey->input_dev->name = touchkey->variant->name;
>  	touchkey->input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
>  
>  	input_set_capability(touchkey->input_dev, EV_KEY, KEY_PHONE);
> @@ -203,7 +226,7 @@ static int tm2_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq,
>  					  NULL, tm2_touchkey_irq_handler,
>  					  IRQF_ONESHOT,
> -					  TM2_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME, touchkey);
> +					  touchkey->variant->name, touchkey);
>  	if (error) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev,
>  			"failed to request threaded irq: %d\n", error);
> @@ -211,7 +234,7 @@ static int tm2_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* led device */
> -	touchkey->led_dev.name = TM2_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME;
> +	touchkey->led_dev.name = touchkey->variant->name;
>  	touchkey->led_dev.brightness = LED_FULL;
>  	touchkey->led_dev.max_brightness = LED_ON;
>  	touchkey->led_dev.brightness_set = tm2_touchkey_led_brightness_set;
> @@ -257,12 +280,19 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tm2_touchkey_pm_ops,
>  
>  static const struct i2c_device_id tm2_touchkey_id_table[] = {
>  	{ TM2_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME, 0 },
> +	{ MIDAS_TOUCHKEY_DEV_NAME, 0 },
>  	{ },
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tm2_touchkey_id_table);
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id tm2_touchkey_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "cypress,tm2-touchkey", },
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "cypress,tm2-touchkey",
> +		.data = &tm2_touchkey_variant,
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "cypress,midas-touchkey",
> +		.data = &midas_touchkey_variant,
> +	},
>  	{ },
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tm2_touchkey_of_match);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry