linux-next: manual merge of the f2fs tree with the fscrypt tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon Dec 10 2018 - 18:13:27 EST

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the f2fs tree got a conflict in:


between commit:

848a010287e6 ("f2fs: use IS_ENCRYPTED() to check encryption status")

from the fscrypt tree and commit:

4e240d1bab1e ("f2fs: check memory boundary by insane namelen")

from the f2fs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/f2fs/dir.c
index cf9e2564388d,c0c845da12fa..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
@@@ -808,7 -808,18 +808,18 @@@ int f2fs_fill_dentries(struct dir_conte = d->filename[bit_pos];
de_name.len = le16_to_cpu(de->name_len);

+ /* check memory boundary before moving forward */
+ bit_pos += GET_DENTRY_SLOTS(le16_to_cpu(de->name_len));
+ if (unlikely(bit_pos > d->max)) {
+ f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
+ "%s: corrupted namelen=%d, run fsck to fix.",
+ __func__, le16_to_cpu(de->name_len));
+ set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
- if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(d->inode)) {
+ if (IS_ENCRYPTED(d->inode)) {
int save_len = fstr->len;

err = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(d->inode,

Attachment: pgpB04wkV9gxX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature