Re: [PATCH] clk: Use of_node_name_eq for node name comparisons

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Tue Dec 11 2018 - 04:43:16 EST


On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 20:50, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Convert string compares of DT node names to use of_node_name_eq helper
> instead. This removes direct access to the node name pointer.
>
> For instances using of_node_cmp, this has the side effect of now using
> case sensitive comparisons. This should not matter for any FDT based
> system which all of these are.
>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

For the ux500 part:

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
> drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/ti/dpll.c | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c | 10 +++++-----
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c
> index 1c1768c2cc82..765175d1148a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ int cpg_mstp_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *unused, struct device *dev)
> goto found;
>
> /* BSC on r8a73a4/sh73a0 uses zb_clk instead of an mstp clock */
> - if (!strcmp(clkspec.np->name, "zb_clk"))
> + if (of_node_name_eq(clkspec.np, "zb_clk"))
> goto found;
>
> of_node_put(clkspec.np);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
> index 469f560ae1cf..40630eb950fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static void __init _ti_omap4_clkctrl_setup(struct device_node *node)
> char *c;
>
> if (!(ti_clk_get_features()->flags & TI_CLK_CLKCTRL_COMPAT) &&
> - !strcmp(node->name, "clk"))
> + of_node_name_eq(node, "clk"))
> ti_clk_features.flags |= TI_CLK_CLKCTRL_COMPAT;
>
> addrp = of_get_address(node, 0, NULL, NULL);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/dpll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/dpll.c
> index 92e28af7afba..6c3329bc116f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/dpll.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static void __init of_ti_omap3_dpll_setup(struct device_node *node)
>
> if ((of_machine_is_compatible("ti,omap3630") ||
> of_machine_is_compatible("ti,omap36xx")) &&
> - !strcmp(node->name, "dpll5_ck"))
> + of_node_name_eq(node, "dpll5_ck"))
> of_ti_dpll_setup(node, &omap3_dpll5_ck_ops, &dd);
> else
> of_ti_dpll_setup(node, &omap3_dpll_ck_ops, &dd);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c
> index d5888591e1a9..18a3c4522831 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c
> @@ -545,21 +545,21 @@ static void u8500_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> static struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
>
> - if (!of_node_cmp(child->name, "prcmu-clock")) {
> + if (of_node_name_eq(child, "prcmu-clock")) {
> clk_data.clks = prcmu_clk;
> clk_data.clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(prcmu_clk);
> of_clk_add_provider(child, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &clk_data);
> }
> - if (!of_node_cmp(child->name, "prcc-periph-clock"))
> + if (of_node_name_eq(child, "prcc-periph-clock"))
> of_clk_add_provider(child, ux500_twocell_get, prcc_pclk);
>
> - if (!of_node_cmp(child->name, "prcc-kernel-clock"))
> + if (of_node_name_eq(child, "prcc-kernel-clock"))
> of_clk_add_provider(child, ux500_twocell_get, prcc_kclk);
>
> - if (!of_node_cmp(child->name, "rtc32k-clock"))
> + if (of_node_name_eq(child, "rtc32k-clock"))
> of_clk_add_provider(child, of_clk_src_simple_get, rtc_clk);
>
> - if (!of_node_cmp(child->name, "smp-twd-clock"))
> + if (of_node_name_eq(child, "smp-twd-clock"))
> of_clk_add_provider(child, of_clk_src_simple_get, twd_clk);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.19.1
>