Re: [PATCH v16 06/16] lib: fdt: add a helper function for handling memory range property

[James Morse]

Hi Akashi,

On 11/12/2018 06:17, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:12:47AM +0000, James Morse wrote:
>> On 06/12/2018 15:54, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 08:47:04AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:52 PM AKASHI Takahiro
>>>> <takahiro.akashi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Added function, fdt_setprop_reg(), will be used later to handle
>>>>> kexec-specific property in arm64's kexec_file implementation.
>>>>> It will possibly be merged into libfdt in the future.
>>>>
>>>> You generally can't modify libfdt files. Any changes will be blown
>>>> away with the next dtc sync (there's one in -next now). Though here
>>>> you are creating a new location with fdt code. lib/ is just a shim to
>>>> the actual libfdt code. Don't put any implementation there. You can
>>>> add this to drivers/of/fdt_address.c for the short term, but it still
>>>> needs to go upstream.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, the implementation looks fine to me.
>>>
>>> I agree, but I don't think there's a real need for us to hack
>>> drivers/of/fdt_address.c in the meantime -- let's just target upstream
>>> and not carry this in the kernel.
>>>
>>> Akashi -- for now, I'll drop the kdump parts of this series which rely
>>> on this helper. The majority of the series is actually independent and
>>> can go in as-is.
>>>
>>> I've pushed out a kexec branch to the arm64 tree for you to take a look
>>> at:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kexec
>>
>> I gave this a quick spin. Without the elfcorehdr/usable-memory-range arm64 needs
>> to explicitly forbid kdump via kexec_file_load. (like powerpc does already).
> 
> Thank you for pointing this out.
> 
>> Without this kdump works, but the second kernel overwrites the first as those DT
>> properties are missing.
>>
>> I'll post a patch momentarily,
> 
> Fine, but anyhow I'm going to submit a new version (*without* kdump),
> I will fix the issue along with others.

I had a quick look at the arm64 for-next/core branch. Will has queued the
non-kdump parts of this series.

If you have changes, they need to be against the arm64 tree.


Thanks,

James