Re: [PATCH 3/3] irq/affinity: Fix a possible breakage

[Dou Liyang]

Hi tglx,
on 2018/12/5 16:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
>
> > In case of irq_default_affinity != cpu_possible_mask, setting the affinity
> > for the pre/post vectors to irq_default_affinity is a breakage.
>
> Why so? All interrupts which are not managed get te default affinity
> mask. It can be different than cpu_possible_mask, but that's what the admin
> has set. The affinity of these non-managed interrupts can still be set via
> /proc/... so where is the breakage?

I misunderstood it. please ignore this, ;-)

Thanks,
	dou