Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] perf cs-etm: Treat NO_SYNC element as trace discontinuity

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:09:49PM +0800, leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:41:54AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:38:54AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:38:26PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > > > CoreSight tracer driver might insert barrier packet between different
> > > > buffers, thus the decoder can spot the boundaries based on the barrier
> > > > packet; the decoder is possible to hit a barrier packet and emit a
> > > > NO_SYNC element, then the decoder will find a periodic synchronisation
> > > > point inside that next trace block that starts trace again but does not
> > > > have the TRACE_ON element as indicator - usually because this block of
> > > > trace has wrapped the buffer so we have lost the original point that
> > > > trace was enabled.
> > > > 
> > > > In upper case, it results in the trace stream only inserts the
> > > > OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC element in the middle of tracing stream, but
> > > > we don't handle NO_SYNC element properly and at the end users miss to
> > > > see the info for trace discontinuity.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > "In upper case"? Maybe:
> > > 
> > > In the former case it causes the insertion of a OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC
> > > in the middle of the the tracing stream, but as we were npt handling the
> > > NO_SYNC element properly which ends up making users miss the
> > > discontinuity indication"?
> > 
> > > > Though OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC is different from CS_ETM_TRACE_ON when
> > > > output from the decoder, but both of them indicate the trace data is
> > > 
> > > can we remove the "but" and "of them" (redundant) above?
> > > 
> > > > discontinuous; this patch treats OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC as trace
> > >                                                                a
> > > > discontinuity and generates CS_ETM_DISCONTINUITY packet for it, so
> > > > cs-etm can handle discontinuity for this case, finally it saves the last
> > >                        it (way too many "discontinuity")
> > > > trace data for previous trace block and restart samples for new block.
> > 
> > I've tentatively done those changes (and a few more) in my local branch,
> > resulting in the wording below, plese let me know if you are ok with it:
> 
> Very appreciate your helping.  Please see some minor typos in below
> commit:
> 
> > commit 148068b45fe2e93b19c06cfc1140ea12ca72eb59
> > Author: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Tue Dec 11 15:38:26 2018 +0800
> > 
> >     perf cs-etm: Treat NO_SYNC element as trace discontinuity
> >     
> >     The CoreSight tracer driver might insert a barrier packets between
>                                                          packet

                                             I'll remove the 'a' instead, ok?


> >     different buffers, thus the decoder can spot the boundaries based on the
> >     barrier packet; it is possible for the decoder to hit a barrier packet
> >     and emit a NO_SYNC element, then the decoder will find a periodic
> >     synchronisation point inside that next trace block that starts the trace
> >     again but does not have the TRACE_ON element as indicator - usually
> >     because this trace block has wrapped the buffer so we have lost the
> >     original point when the trace was enabled.
> >     
> >     In the first case it causes the insertion of a OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC
>              former
> >     in the middle of the the tracing stream, but as we were npt handling the
>                                                               not
> >     NO_SYNC element properly which ends up making users miss the
> >     discontinuity indication"?
>                               s/?/.
> 
> Thanks a lot for helping.  If you prefer me to resend the patch set,
> also let me know.

I can fix it, here.
 
> >     Though OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC is different from CS_ETM_TRACE_ON when
> >     output from the decoder, both indicate that the trace data is
> >     discontinuous; this patch treats OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC as a trace
> >     discontinuity and generates a CS_ETM_DISCONTINUITY packet for it, so
> >     cs-etm can handle the discontinuity for this case, finally it saves the
> >     last trace data for the previous trace block and restart samples for the
> >     new block.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Cc: Robert Walker <robert.walker@xxxxxxx>
> >     Cc: coresight ml <coresight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1544513908-16805-7-git-send-email-leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx
> >     Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> > index 1039f364f4cc..bee026e76a4c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> > @@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ static ocsd_datapath_resp_t cs_etm_decoder__gen_trace_elem_printer(
> >  	case OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_UNKNOWN:
> >  		break;
> >  	case OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC:
> > -		break;
> >  	case OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_TRACE_ON:
> >  		resp = cs_etm_decoder__buffer_discontinuity(decoder,
> >  							    trace_chan_id);
> > 
> > 

-- 

- Arnaldo