Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat: New macros to determine the FAT variant (32, 16 or 12)

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Tamir Carmeli <carmeli.tamir@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I just want to make sure, is there a reason why I shouldn't delete
> FAT_FIRST_ENT, as Joe Perches commented?

FAT_FIRST_ENT() was used to check if fat spec compliance. But in real
world, there are too many implementations that didn't follow spec.

Well, so, now FAT_FIRST_ENT() is pointed only from comment. The reason
is only for this comment.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>