Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:54 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:26 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > If we want to map memory from the DMA allocator to userspace it must be
> > zeroed at allocation time to prevent stale data leaks.   We already do
> > this on most common architectures, but some architectures don't do this
> > yet, fix them up, either by passing GFP_ZERO when we use the normal page
> > allocator or doing a manual memset otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/dma.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/dma.c
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void *arch_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
> >         size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> >         order = get_order(size);
> >
> > -       page = alloc_pages(flag, order);
> > +       page = alloc_pages(flag | GFP_ZERO, order);
> >         if (!page)
> >                 return NULL;
>
> There's second implementation below, which calls __get_free_pages() and
> does an explicit memset().  As __get_free_pages() calls alloc_pages(), perhaps
> it makes sense to replace the memset() by GFP_ZERO, to increase consistency?

Regardless, for m68k:
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds