On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:52:15AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:I'll update both
On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 14:01 +0100, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:"Co-developed-by:" please.
As per Documentation/process/submitting-patches, Co-developed-by is aYour commit message doesn't match your subject.
valid signature.
This commit removes the warning.
A couple variants have been documented and only
one should actually be used.
$ git grep -i co-developed-by Documentation/process/
Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst: - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:12) When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-Developed-by:
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:A Co-Developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer
$ git log --grep="co-developed-by:" -i | \
grep -ohiP "co-developed-by:" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
80 Co-developed-by:
40 Co-Developed-by:
So which should it be?
Yeah, I wrote the original one wrong here, sorry.
btw: I prefer neither as I think Signed-off-by: is sufficient.Nope, sorry, it is not, we need something like this which is why it was
added.
thanks,
greg k-h
.