Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip: add driver for imx-irqsteer controller

[Marc Zyngier]

Hi Lucas,

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 10:22:44 +0000,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The irqsteer block is a interrupt multiplexer/remapper found on the
> i.MX8 line of SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
>  - use raw_spinlock
>  - add proper clk error handling
>  - align register offset calculation with reality
>  - use correct SPDX identifier
>  - simplify DT configuration
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig            |   8 +
>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile           |   1 +
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c | 269 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 278 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 51a5ef0e96ed..25607a002bf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -391,6 +391,14 @@ config CSKY_APB_INTC
>  	  by C-SKY single core SOC system. It use mmio map apb-bus to visit
>  	  the controller's register.
>  
> +config IMX_IRQSTEER
> +	bool "i.MX IRQSTEER support"
> +	depends on ARCH_MXC || COMPILE_TEST
> +	default ARCH_MXC
> +	select IRQ_DOMAIN
> +	help
> +	  Support for the i.MX IRQSTEER interrupt multiplexer/remapper.
> +
>  endmenu
>  
>  config SIFIVE_PLIC
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 794c13d3ac3d..8ef99b3f7e4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -91,3 +91,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_PDC)			+= qcom-pdc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CSKY_MPINTC)		+= irq-csky-mpintc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CSKY_APB_INTC)		+= irq-csky-apb-intc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE_PLIC)		+= irq-sifive-plic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_IRQSTEER)		+= irq-imx-irqsteer.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..099148045657
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2017 NXP
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Pengutronix, Lucas Stach <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +#define CTRL_STRIDE_OFF(_t, _r)	(_t * 8 * _r)
> +#define CHANCTRL		0x0
> +#define CHANMASK(n, t)		(CTRL_STRIDE_OFF(t, 0) + 0x4 * (n) + 0x4)
> +#define CHANSET(n, t)		(CTRL_STRIDE_OFF(t, 1) + 0x4 * (n) + 0x4)
> +#define CHANSTATUS(n, t)	(CTRL_STRIDE_OFF(t, 2) + 0x4 * (n) + 0x4)
> +#define CHAN_MINTDIS(t)		(CTRL_STRIDE_OFF(t, 3) + 0x4)
> +#define CHAN_MASTRSTAT(t)	(CTRL_STRIDE_OFF(t, 3) + 0x8)
> +
> +struct irqsteer_data {
> +	void __iomem		*regs;
> +	struct clk		*ipg_clk;
> +	int			irq;
> +	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
> +	int			irq_groups;
> +	int			channel;
> +	struct irq_domain	*domain;
> +	u32			*saved_reg;
> +};
> +
> +static int imx_irqsteer_get_reg_index(struct irqsteer_data *data,
> +				      unsigned long irqnum)
> +{
> +	return (data->irq_groups * 2 - irqnum / 32 - 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_irqsteer_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct irqsteer_data *data = d->chip_data;
> +	int idx = imx_irqsteer_get_reg_index(data, d->hwirq);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
> +	val = readl_relaxed(data->regs + CHANMASK(idx, data->irq_groups));
> +	val |= BIT(d->hwirq % 32);
> +	writel_relaxed(val, data->regs + CHANMASK(idx, data->irq_groups));
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_irqsteer_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct irqsteer_data *data = d->chip_data;
> +	int idx = imx_irqsteer_get_reg_index(data, d->hwirq);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
> +	val = readl_relaxed(data->regs + CHANMASK(idx, data->irq_groups));
> +	val &= ~BIT(d->hwirq % 32);
> +	writel_relaxed(val, data->regs + CHANMASK(idx, data->irq_groups));
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_irqsteer_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int flow_type)
> +{
> +	if ((flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip imx_irqsteer_irq_chip = {
> +	.name		= "irqsteer",
> +	.irq_mask	= imx_irqsteer_irq_mask,
> +	.irq_unmask	= imx_irqsteer_irq_unmask,
> +	.irq_set_type	= imx_irqsteer_set_type,
> +};
> +
> +static int imx_irqsteer_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int irq,
> +				irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> +	irq_set_chip_data(irq, h->host_data);
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &imx_irqsteer_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops imx_irqsteer_domain_ops = {
> +	.map		= imx_irqsteer_irq_map,
> +	.xlate		= irq_domain_xlate_twocell,

I've tried to understand why you are using two cells, but couldn't
find an explanation from the DT binding. As far as I can see, you only
support LEVEL_HIGH signalling, meaning that you could perfectly
encode this in a single cell. What am I missing?

> +};
> +
> +static void imx_irqsteer_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	struct irqsteer_data *data = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	int i;
> +
> +	chained_irq_enter(irq_desc_get_chip(desc), desc);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < data->irq_groups * 64; i += 32) {
> +		int idx = imx_irqsteer_get_reg_index(data, i);
> +		unsigned long irqmap;
> +		int pos, virq;
> +
> +		irqmap = readl_relaxed(data->regs +
> +				       CHANSTATUS(idx, data->irq_groups));
> +
> +		for_each_set_bit(pos, &irqmap, 32) {
> +			virq = irq_find_mapping(data->domain, pos + i);
> +			if (virq)
> +				generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	chained_irq_exit(irq_desc_get_chip(desc), desc);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_irqsteer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	struct irqsteer_data *data;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	data->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->regs)) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize reg\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(data->regs);
> +	}
> +
> +	data->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (data->irq <= 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	data->ipg_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ipg");
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->ipg_clk)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(data->ipg_clk);
> +		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get ipg clk: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
> +
> +	of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,irq-groups", &data->irq_groups);
> +	of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,channel", &data->channel);
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) {
> +		data->saved_reg = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +					sizeof(u32) * data->irq_groups * 2,
> +					GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!data->saved_reg)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->ipg_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable ipg clk: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* steer all IRQs into configured channel */
> +	writel_relaxed(BIT(data->channel), data->regs + CHANCTRL);

Could you explain what this channel is exactly?

> +
> +	data->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(np, data->irq_groups * 64,
> +					     &imx_irqsteer_domain_ops, data);
> +	if (!data->domain) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(data->ipg_clk);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(data->irq, imx_irqsteer_irq_handler,
> +					 data);
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_irqsteer_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct irqsteer_data *irqsteer_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irqsteer_data->irq, NULL, NULL);
> +	irq_domain_remove(irqsteer_data->domain);
> +
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(irqsteer_data->ipg_clk);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static void imx_irqsteer_save_regs(struct irqsteer_data *data)
> +{
> +	int num;
> +
> +	for (num = 0; num < data->irq_groups; num++)
> +		data->saved_reg[num + 1] = readl_relaxed(data->regs +
> +						CHANMASK(num, data->irq_groups));

You seem to only use one u32 per IRQ group. Yet, you've allocated
twice as much memory to that effect. Why? Also, you're avoiding to use
index 0, which I find rather odd.

Given that the DT binding states that each group manages 64
interrupts, I have the feeling that you're missing some interrupt
enable state.

> +}
> +
> +static void imx_irqsteer_restore_regs(struct irqsteer_data *data)
> +{
> +	int num;
> +
> +	writel_relaxed(BIT(data->channel), data->regs + CHANCTRL);
> +	for (num = 0; num < data->irq_groups; num++)
> +		writel_relaxed(data->saved_reg[num + 1],
> +			       data->regs + CHANMASK(num, data->irq_groups));
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_irqsteer_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct irqsteer_data *irqsteer_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	imx_irqsteer_save_regs(irqsteer_data);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(irqsteer_data->ipg_clk);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_irqsteer_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct irqsteer_data *irqsteer_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(irqsteer_data->ipg_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to enable ipg clk: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	imx_irqsteer_restore_regs(irqsteer_data);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops imx_irqsteer_pm_ops = {
> +	SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(imx_irqsteer_suspend, imx_irqsteer_resume)
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id imx_irqsteer_dt_ids[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx-irqsteer", },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver imx_irqsteer_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "imx-irqsteer",
> +		.of_match_table = imx_irqsteer_dt_ids,
> +		.pm = &imx_irqsteer_pm_ops,
> +	},
> +	.probe = imx_irqsteer_probe,
> +	.remove = imx_irqsteer_remove,
> +};
> +builtin_platform_driver(imx_irqsteer_driver);
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 

This looks much better than the original submission. If you quickly
clarify the few questions I have, we can probably move this quickly
enough.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.