Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: add Co-developed-by to signature tags

[Joe Perches]

On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 12:16 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:35:28 +0100 Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > As per Documentation/process/submitting-patches, Co-developed-by is a
> > valid signature.
> > 
> 
> I'm with Joe - I find this tag kinda useless and duplicative.  But whatever.
> 
> But as the documentation says, Co-developed-by must be accompanied by a
> Signed-off-by:.  It would be helpful if checkpatch were to detect a
> failure to do this.

perhaps
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 93e84c9504a1..056d4b47ffaf 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2673,7 +2673,20 @@ sub process {
 				WARN("BAD_SIGN_OFF",
 				     "Duplicate signature\n" . $herecurr);
 			} else {
-				$signatures{$sig_nospace} = 1;
+				$signatures{$sig_nospace} = $herecurr;
+			}
+		}
+
+# Check for "Co-developed-by:" uses without equivalent "Signed-off-by:"
+# $signatures keys are all lower case without spaces
+		if ($rawline =~ /^---$/) {
+			foreach my $sig (keys %signatures) {
+				next if ($sig !~ /^co-developed-by:(.*)/);
+				my $signer = $1;
+				if (!defined $signatures{"signed-off-by:$signer"}) {
+					WARN("CODEVELOPED_WITHOUT_SIGNOFF",
+					     "Co-developed-by: used without Signed-off-by: by same person\n" . $signatures{$sig});
+				}
 			}
 		}