Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: nvec: nvec: fixed check style issues
From: Greg KH
Date: Mon Dec 17 2018 - 03:16:48 EST
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 08:57:43AM -0800, Amir Mahdi Ghorbanian wrote:
> @@ -626,7 +628,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
> break;
> case 2: /* first byte after command */
> if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
> - udelay(33);
> + usleep_range(0, 33);
Why is this a valid range to sleep for for this device? Have you been
able to verify/test this?
thanks,
greg k-h