Re: [PATCH][next] nvmet: fix comparison of a u16 with -1

From: Chaitanya Kulkarni
Date: Mon Dec 17 2018 - 13:04:49 EST

Next message: Paolo Bonzini: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/kvm/hyper-v: Implement KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: objtool warnings for kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH][next] nvmet: fix comparison of a u16 with -1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Will send out a path.

ïOn 12/16/18, 8:26 AM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks, applied.

Maybe it might be worth adding a NVME_NO_ERR_LOC defintion to clean
this up a bit more. Chaitanya, can you look into that?

Next message: Paolo Bonzini: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/kvm/hyper-v: Implement KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: objtool warnings for kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH][next] nvmet: fix comparison of a u16 with -1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]