Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ Firmware bindings
From: Rob Herring
Date: Mon Dec 17 2018 - 15:45:52 EST
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:32:59PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-12-13 20:10:23)
> > Add QCOM cpufreq firmware device bindings for Qualcomm Technology Inc's
> > SoCs. This is required for managing the cpu frequency transitions which are
> > controlled by the hardware engine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> except one question below for Rob.
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..33856947
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> > +Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. CPUFREQ Bindings
> > +
> > +CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by some Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (QTI)
> > +SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> > +for multiple clusters.
> > +
> > +Properties:
> > +- compatible
> > + Usage: required
> > + Value type: <string>
> > + Definition: must be "qcom,cpufreq-hw".
> > +
> > +- clocks
> > + Usage: required
> > + Value type: <phandle> From common clock binding.
> > + Definition: clock handle for XO clock and GPLL0 clock.
> > +
> > +- clock-names
> > + Usage: required
> > + Value type: <string> From common clock binding.
> > + Definition: must be "xo", "alternate".
> > +
> > +- reg
> > + Usage: required
> > + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> > + Definition: Addresses and sizes for the memory of the HW bases in
> > + each frequency domain.
> > +- reg-names
> > + Usage: Optional
> > + Value type: <string>
> > + Definition: Frequency domain name i.e.
> > + "freq-domain0", "freq-domain1".
> > +
> > +- #freq-domain-cells:
>
> I still wonder if this should be #qcom,freq-domain-cells, but if Rob is
> OK I won't complain.
Probably should be. Though I did give my R-by without.
Rob