On 12/17/18 10:03 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:Agreed, maybe by that time DRM part will also get its r-b/ack
On 12/17/18 4:52 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 12/17/18 5:19 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:Agree, but this is the basis for the new pv camera frontend
Hello, Juergen, Boris!
As this DRM part of the series is the only one which needs ack/nack
(and it might take quite some time to complete) could we please
merge the patches 1 and 3 now that already have ack/r-b?
TBH I am not sure it makes sense to do this without the second patch.
Refactoring (and IIUIC this series is purely refactoring --- is it not?)
is done to reduce amount of code, and with only first and third patch we
end up with quite a significant increase in the number of LoC. (I am
going purely by diffstat)
Of course, the other reason for refactoring is to eliminate code
duplication, but without second patch that will not happen.
I am working on now [1], so even if we do not remove the code from DRM
then we at least do not add it to the camera driver
Since 1 and 3 are already ACKed you should be able to start the camera
series with these two patches as pre-requisites even if patch 2 is still
stalled by the time your camera code is posted (which I assume will be
4.22 or later).
-boris
-borisThank you,
Oleksandr
[1]
https://github.com/andr2000/linux/blob/camera_front_v1/drivers/media/xen/Kconfig#L6