Re: [PATCH V2 5/9] x86/alternative: Split text_poke_bp() into tree steps

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue Dec 18 2018 - 12:25:14 EST

Next message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH 18/52] virtio-fs: Map cache using the values from the capabilities"
Previous message: Andrea Righi: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs"
In reply to: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira: "[PATCH V2 5/9] x86/alternative: Split text_poke_bp() into tree steps"
Next in thread: Jiri Kosina: "Re: [PATCH V2 5/9] x86/alternative: Split text_poke_bp() into tree steps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Splitting text_poke_bp() into tree steps. Is this a subtle joke on
static_branches?

;-)

-- Steve

Next message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH 18/52] virtio-fs: Map cache using the values from the capabilities"
Previous message: Andrea Righi: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs"
In reply to: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira: "[PATCH V2 5/9] x86/alternative: Split text_poke_bp() into tree steps"
Next in thread: Jiri Kosina: "Re: [PATCH V2 5/9] x86/alternative: Split text_poke_bp() into tree steps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]