Re: [PATCH 18/41] scsi: isci: remote_device: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Hi,

Friendly ping:

Who can ack or review this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/27/18 10:30 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in
> order to separate the "fall through" annotations from the rest of
> the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
> index cc51f38b116d..9d29edb9f590 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void isci_remote_device_not_ready(struct isci_host *ihost,
>   		/* Kill all outstanding requests for the device. */
>   		sci_remote_device_terminate_requests(idev);
>   
> -		/* Fall through into the default case... */
> +		/* Fall through - into the default case... */
>   	default:
>   		clear_bit(IDEV_IO_READY, &idev->flags);
>   		break;
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ enum sci_status sci_remote_device_event_handler(struct isci_remote_device *idev,
>   
>   			break;
>   		}
> -	/* Else, fall through and treat as unhandled... */
> +		/* fall through - and treat as unhandled... */
>   	default:
>   		dev_dbg(scirdev_to_dev(idev),
>   			"%s: device: %p event code: %x: %s\n",