Re: [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*"

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:48:09AM +0000, Colin King escreveu:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The spelling of the SECCOMP is incorrect, fix these.

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo
 
> Fixes: c65c83ffe904 ("perf trace: Allow asking for not suppressing common string prefixes")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> index 4600c28a3cfe..637722e2796b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>  static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_op(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg)
>  {
>  	bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
> -	const char *prefix = "SECOMP_SET_MODE_";
> +	const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_SET_MODE_";
>  	int op = arg->val;
>  	size_t printed = 0;
>  
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_flags(char *bf, size_t size,
>  						   struct syscall_arg *arg)
>  {
>  	bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
> -	const char *prefix = "SECOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
> +	const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
>  	int printed = 0, flags = arg->val;
>  
>  #define	P_FLAG(n) \
> -- 
> 2.19.1

-- 

- Arnaldo