Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] iio: accell: mma8452: add vdd/vddio regulator operation support

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Dec 22 2018 - 12:20:27 EST

Next message: Ellie Revves: "[BREAKAGE] Since 4.18, kernel sets SB_I_NODEV implicitly on userns mounts, breaking systemd-nspawn"
Previous message: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v4] string.h: Add str_has_prefix() helper function"
In reply to: Anson Huang: "[PATCH V5 2/2] iio: accell: mma8452: add vdd/vddio regulator operation support"
Next in thread: Anson Huang: "RE: [PATCH V5 2/2] iio: accell: mma8452: add vdd/vddio regulator operation support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 05:22:55 +0000
Anson Huang <anson.huang@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The accelerometer's power supply could be controllable on some
> platforms, such as i.MX6Q-SABRESD board, the mma8451's power supplies
> are controlled by a GPIO fixed regulator, need to make sure the
> regulators are enabled before any communication with mma8451, this
> patch adds vdd/vddio regulator operation support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@xxxxxxxxx>

There is a lot of manual handling in the suspend and resume I would not expect
to see. That should be using the runtime pm calls to take control of pm rather
than making assumptions about what runtime pm state we are in...

Jonathan

> ---
> ChangeLog since V4:
> - using devm_regulator_get() instead of devm_regulator_get_optional() since the regulator is
> there always, if dtb does NOT specify one, regulator framework will assign dummy regulator for it.
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> index 421a0a8..9a52426 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>
> #define MMA8452_STATUS 0x00
> #define MMA8452_STATUS_DRDY (BIT(2) | BIT(1) | BIT(0))
> @@ -107,6 +108,8 @@ struct mma8452_data {
> u8 data_cfg;
> const struct mma_chip_info *chip_info;
> int sleep_val;
> + struct regulator *vdd_reg;
> + struct regulator *vddio_reg;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -1534,9 +1537,37 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> mutex_init(&data->lock);
> data->chip_info = match->data;
>
> + data->vdd_reg = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, "vdd");
> + if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_reg)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get VDD regulator!\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable VDD regulator!\n");
> + return ret;
> + }

Please reorder so the unwind order in remove and devm cleanup is the
opposite of setup order. I suspect that is just a case of
doing the two gets before enabling either regulator, but I haven't checked.

> +
> + data->vddio_reg = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, "vddio");
> + if (IS_ERR(data->vddio_reg)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get VDDIO regulator!\n");
> + goto disable_regulator_vdd;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable VDDIO regulator!\n");
> + goto disable_regulator_vdd;
> + }
> +
> ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, MMA8452_WHO_AM_I);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto disable_regulators;
>
> switch (ret) {
> case MMA8451_DEVICE_ID:
> @@ -1549,7 +1580,8 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> break;
> /* else: fall through */
> default:
> - return -ENODEV;
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto disable_regulators;
> }
>
> dev_info(&client->dev, "registering %s accelerometer; ID 0x%x\n",
> @@ -1566,13 +1598,13 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> ret = mma8452_reset(client);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto disable_regulators;
>
> data->data_cfg = MMA8452_DATA_CFG_FS_2G;
> ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MMA8452_DATA_CFG,
> data->data_cfg);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto disable_regulators;
>
> /*
> * By default set transient threshold to max to avoid events if
> @@ -1581,7 +1613,7 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MMA8452_TRANSIENT_THS,
> MMA8452_TRANSIENT_THS_MASK);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto disable_regulators;
>
> if (client->irq) {
> int irq2;
> @@ -1595,7 +1627,7 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> MMA8452_CTRL_REG5,
> data->chip_info->all_events);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto disable_regulators;
>
> dev_dbg(&client->dev, "using interrupt line INT1\n");
> }
> @@ -1604,11 +1636,11 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> MMA8452_CTRL_REG4,
> data->chip_info->enabled_events);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto disable_regulators;
>
> ret = mma8452_trigger_setup(indio_dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto disable_regulators;
> }
>
> data->ctrl_reg1 = MMA8452_CTRL_ACTIVE |
> @@ -1661,12 +1693,20 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> trigger_cleanup:
> mma8452_trigger_cleanup(indio_dev);
>
> +disable_regulators:
> + regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> +
> +disable_regulator_vdd:
> + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> static int mma8452_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + struct mma8452_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
>
> iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>
> @@ -1678,6 +1718,18 @@ static int mma8452_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> mma8452_trigger_cleanup(indio_dev);
> mma8452_standby(iio_priv(indio_dev));
>
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to disable VDDIO regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to disable VDD regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1696,6 +1748,18 @@ static int mma8452_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable VDDIO regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable VDD regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1705,9 +1769,22 @@ static int mma8452_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct mma8452_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> int ret, sleep_val;
>
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDD regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDDIO regulator\n");
> + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> ret = mma8452_active(data);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto runtime_resume_failed;
>
> ret = mma8452_get_odr_index(data);
> sleep_val = 1000 / mma8452_samp_freq[ret][0];
> @@ -1717,20 +1794,104 @@ static int mma8452_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> msleep_interruptible(sleep_val);
>
> return 0;
> +
> +runtime_resume_failed:
> + regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int mma8452_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return mma8452_standby(iio_priv(i2c_get_clientdata(
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> + struct mma8452_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
> +

I'd rather see the runtime pm calls done than doing this directly.
So you should let the runtime pm know it needs to power the device on,
then take over control (disable runtime pm) and power down.

> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDD regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDDIO regulator\n");
> + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = mma8452_standby(iio_priv(i2c_get_clientdata(
> to_i2c_client(dev))));
> + if (ret)
> + goto suspend_failed;
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable VDDIO regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable VDD regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +suspend_failed:
> + regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int mma8452_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return mma8452_active(iio_priv(i2c_get_clientdata(
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> + struct mma8452_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDD regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDDIO regulator\n");
> + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = mma8452_active(iio_priv(i2c_get_clientdata(
> to_i2c_client(dev))));
> + if (ret)
> + goto resume_failed;
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable VDDIO regulator\n");
> + return ret;

This is odd in a resume path to turn it off. Normally you just hand
off to the runtime pm again to autosuspend as necessary.

> + }
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable VDD regulator\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +resume_failed:
> + regulator_disable(data->vddio_reg);
> + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> #endif
>

Next message: Ellie Revves: "[BREAKAGE] Since 4.18, kernel sets SB_I_NODEV implicitly on userns mounts, breaking systemd-nspawn"
Previous message: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v4] string.h: Add str_has_prefix() helper function"
In reply to: Anson Huang: "[PATCH V5 2/2] iio: accell: mma8452: add vdd/vddio regulator operation support"
Next in thread: Anson Huang: "RE: [PATCH V5 2/2] iio: accell: mma8452: add vdd/vddio regulator operation support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]