Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2018-12-07 01:55:58)
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Driver to control the Synopsys SS PHY 1.0.0 implemeneted in QCS404
Based on Sriharsha Allenki's <sallenki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> original code.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
chain should be swapped?
Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b6a55e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c
+
+struct ssphy_priv {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct reset_control *reset_com;
+ struct reset_control *reset_phy;
+ struct clk *clk_ref;
+ struct clk *clk_phy;
+ struct clk *clk_pipe;
Use bulk clk APIs? And just get and enable all the clks?
+ struct regulator *vdda1p8;
+ struct regulator *vbus;
+ struct regulator *vdd;
+ unsigned int vdd_levels[LEVEL_NUM];
+};
+
+static inline void qcom_ssphy_updatel(void __iomem *addr, u32 mask, u32 val)
+{
+ writel((readl(addr) & ~mask) | val, addr);
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_config_vdd(struct ssphy_priv *priv,
+ enum phy_vdd_level level)
+{
+ return regulator_set_voltage(priv->vdd,
+ priv->vdd_levels[level],
+ priv->vdd_levels[LEVEL_MAX]);
regulator_set_voltage(reg, 0, max) is very suspicious. It's voltage
corners where the voltages are known?
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_ldo_enable(struct ssphy_priv *priv)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regulator_set_load(priv->vdda1p8, 23000);
Do you need to do this? Why can't the regulator be in high power mode
all the time and then go low power when it's disabled?
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to set regulator1p8 load\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage(priv->vdda1p8, 1800000, 1800000);
This looks unnecessary. The 1.8V regulator sounds like it better be 1.8V
so board constraints should enforce that. All that should be here is
enabling the regulator.
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to set regulator1p8 voltage\n");
+ goto put_vdda1p8_lpm;
+ }
+
+ ret = regulator_enable(priv->vdda1p8);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable regulator1p8\n");
+ goto unset_vdda1p8;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+
+ /* rollback regulator changes */
+
+unset_vdda1p8:
+ regulator_set_voltage(priv->vdda1p8, 0, 1800000);
+
+put_vdda1p8_lpm:
+ regulator_set_load(priv->vdda1p8, 0);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void qcom_ssphy_ldo_disable(struct ssphy_priv *priv)
+{
+ regulator_disable(priv->vdda1p8);
+ regulator_set_voltage(priv->vdda1p8, 0, 1800000);
Urgh why?
+ regulator_set_load(priv->vdda1p8, 0);
+}