Re: [PATCH] sched: fix infinity loop in update_blocked_averages

[Vincent Guittot]

Le Thursday 27 Dec 2018 à 10:21:53 (+0100), Vincent Guittot a écrit :
> Hi Xie,
> 
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 03:57, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Zhepeng Xie report a bug, there is a infinity loop in
> > update_blocked_averages().
> >
> > PID: 14233  TASK: ffff800b2de08fc0  CPU: 1   COMMAND: "docker"
> >  #0 [ffff00002213b9d0] update_blocked_averages at ffff00000811e4a8
> >  #1 [ffff00002213ba60] pick_next_task_fair at ffff00000812a3b4
> >  #2 [ffff00002213baf0] __schedule at ffff000008deaa88
> >  #3 [ffff00002213bb70] schedule at ffff000008deb1b8
> >  #4 [ffff00002213bb80] futex_wait_queue_me at ffff000008180754
> >  #5 [ffff00002213bbd0] futex_wait at ffff00000818192c
> >  #6 [ffff00002213bd00] do_futex at ffff000008183ee4
> >  #7 [ffff00002213bde0] __arm64_sys_futex at ffff000008184398
> >  #8 [ffff00002213be60] el0_svc_common at ffff0000080979ac
> >  #9 [ffff00002213bea0] el0_svc_handler at ffff000008097a6c
> >  #10 [ffff00002213bff0] el0_svc at ffff000008084044
> >
> > rq->tmp_alone_branch introduced in 4.10, used to point to
> > the new beg of the list. If this cfs_rq is deleted somewhere
> > else, then the tmp_alone_branch will be illegal and cause
> > a list_add corruption.
> 
> shouldn't all the sequence  be protected by rq_lock ?
> 
> 
> >
> > (When enabled DEBUG_LIST, we fould this list_add corruption)
> >
> > [ 2546.741103] list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev
> > (ffff800b4d61ad40), but was ffff800ba434fa38. (next=ffff800b6a95e740).
> > [ 2546.741130] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 2546.741132] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:25!
> > [ 2546.741136] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> > [ 2546.742870] CPU: 1 PID: 29428 Comm: docker-runc Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E  4.19.5-1.aarch64 #1
> > [ 2546.745415] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> > [ 2546.747402] pstate: 40000085 (nZcv daIf -PAN -UAO)
> > [ 2546.749015] pc : __list_add_valid+0x50/0x90
> > [ 2546.750485] lr : __list_add_valid+0x50/0x90
> > [ 2546.751975] sp : ffff00001b5eb910
> > [ 2546.753286] x29: ffff00001b5eb910 x28: ffff800abacf0000
> > [ 2546.754976] x27: ffff00001b5ebbb0 x26: ffff000009570000
> > [ 2546.756665] x25: ffff00000960d000 x24: 00000250f41ca8f8
> > [ 2546.758366] x23: ffff800b6a95e740 x22: ffff800b4d61ad40
> > [ 2546.760066] x21: ffff800b4d61ad40 x20: ffff800ba434f080
> > [ 2546.761742] x19: ffff800b4d61ac00 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> > [ 2546.763425] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> > [ 2546.765089] x15: ffff000009570748 x14: 6666662073617720
> > [ 2546.766755] x13: 747562202c293034 x12: 6461313664346230
> > [ 2546.768429] x11: 3038666666662820 x10: 0000000000000000
> > [ 2546.770124] x9 : 0000000000000001 x8 : ffff000009f34a0f
> > [ 2546.771831] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000000250d
> > [ 2546.773525] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
> > [ 2546.775227] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 70ef7f624013ca00
> > [ 2546.776929] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000075
> > [ 2546.778623] Process docker-runc (pid: 29428, stack limit = 0x00000000293494a2)
> > [ 2546.780742] Call trace:
> > [ 2546.781955]  __list_add_valid+0x50/0x90
> > [ 2546.783469]  enqueue_entity+0x4a0/0x6e8
> > [ 2546.784957]  enqueue_task_fair+0xac/0x610
> > [ 2546.786502]  sched_move_task+0x134/0x178
> > [ 2546.787993]  cpu_cgroup_attach+0x40/0x78
> > [ 2546.789540]  cgroup_migrate_execute+0x378/0x3a8
> > [ 2546.791169]  cgroup_migrate+0x6c/0x90
> > [ 2546.792663]  cgroup_attach_task+0x148/0x238
> > [ 2546.794211]  __cgroup1_procs_write.isra.2+0xf8/0x160
> > [ 2546.795935]  cgroup1_procs_write+0x38/0x48
> > [ 2546.797492]  cgroup_file_write+0xa0/0x170
> > [ 2546.799010]  kernfs_fop_write+0x114/0x1e0
> > [ 2546.800558]  __vfs_write+0x60/0x190
> > [ 2546.801977]  vfs_write+0xac/0x1c0
> > [ 2546.803341]  ksys_write+0x6c/0xd8
> > [ 2546.804674]  __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30
> > [ 2546.806146]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x100
> > [ 2546.807584]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x88
> > [ 2546.809017]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> >
> 
> Have you got more details about the sequence that generates this bug ?
> Is it easily reproducible ?
> 
> > In this patch, we move rq->tmp_alone_branch point to its prev before delete it
> > from list.
> >
> > Reported-by: Zhipeng Xie <xiezhipeng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Bin Li <huawei.libin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>        [4.10+]
> > Fixes: 9c2791f936ef (sched/fair: Fix hierarchical order in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)
> 
> If it only happens in update_blocked_averages(), the del leaf has been added by:
> a9e7f6544b9c (sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in load balance path)
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Zhipeng Xie <xiezhipeng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index ac855b2..7a72702 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -347,6 +347,11 @@ static inline void list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> >  static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> >  {
> >         if (cfs_rq->on_list) {
> > +               struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> > +
> > +               if (rq->tmp_alone_branch == &cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)
> > +                       rq->tmp_alone_branch = cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.prev;
> > +

I'm afraid that your patch will break the ordering of leaf_cfs_rq_list

Can you tried the patch below:

---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ca46964..4d51b2d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7694,13 +7694,6 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
 		if (se && !skip_blocked_update(se))
 			update_load_avg(cfs_rq_of(se), se, 0);
 
-		/*
-		 * There can be a lot of idle CPU cgroups.  Don't let fully
-		 * decayed cfs_rqs linger on the list.
-		 */
-		if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq))
-			list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
-
 		/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
 		if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
 			done = false;
-- 
2.7.4




> >                 list_del_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
> >                 cfs_rq->on_list = 0;
> >         }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >