Re: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: account ebt_table_info to kmemcg
From: Shakeel Butt
Date: Sat Dec 29 2018 - 14:39:25 EST
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 1:52 AM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, Michal!
> On 29.12.2018 10:33, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 28-12-18 17:55:24, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >> The [ip,ip6,arp]_tables use x_tables_info internally and the underlying
> >> memory is already accounted to kmemcg. Do the same for ebtables. The
> >> syzbot, by using setsockopt(EBT_SO_SET_ENTRIES), was able to OOM the
> >> whole system from a restricted memcg, a potential DoS.
> > What is the lifetime of these objects? Are they bound to any process?
> These are list of ebtables rules, which may be displayed with $ebtables-save command.
> In case of we do not account them, a low priority container may eat all the memory
> and OOM killer in berserk mode will kill all the processes on machine. They are not bound
> to any process, but they are bound to network namespace.
> OOM killer does not analyze such the memory cgroup-related allocations, since it
> is task-aware only. Maybe we should do it namespace-aware too...
This is a good idea. I am already brainstorming on a somewhat similar
idea to make shmem/tmpfs files oom-killable. I will share once I have
something more concrete and will think on namespace angle too.