Re: [PATCH lora-next] net: lora: sx1301: Fix radio SPI write

[Ben Whitten]

+ Mark +linux-kernel
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 at 08:45, Andreas FÃrber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When converting to regmap_bus we omitted the write flag,
> rendering all sx125x register writes no-op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas FÃrber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/lora/sx130x_radio.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/lora/sx130x_radio.c b/drivers/net/lora/sx130x_radio.c
> index 6c94d13cd4db..e7b2df808c1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/lora/sx130x_radio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/lora/sx130x_radio.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   * Copyright (c) 2013 Semtech-Cycleo
>   */
>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> @@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ static int sx1301_regmap_bus_write(void *context, unsigned int reg,
>         ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, cs, 0);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
> -       ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, addr, reg);
> +       ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, addr, BIT(7) | reg);

Curious.
Isn't the (read/write)_flag_mask, set in the regmap_config, a property of
the device connected to the regmap_bus?
I would have expected this to have been applied prior to passing to a
regmap_bus call, surely the bus should only be concerned with transport?

It will work in our case as our current hardware uses 1 in bit 7 but it
will not if we ever see other radios with different masks.

If the regmap_bus provider does need to apply the mask, can we get the
end device regmap_config and apply it from there?
Mark what are your thoughts on the route to take?

Regards,
Ben Whitten