On 12/30/18 6:35 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sun 2018-12-30 18:09:35, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 12/29/18 8:07 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
With the "color" sysfs file it will make more sense to allow for user
defined color palettes.
I think defining these values in the device tree or acpi severely limits the devices
capabilities. Especially in development phases. If the knobs were exposed then the user space
can create new experiences. The color definition should be an absolute color defined in the dt and
either the framework or user space needs to mix these appropriately. IMO user space should set the policy
of the user experience and the dt/acpi needs to set the capabilities.
I do like Pavels idea on defining the more standard binding pattern to "group" leds into a single group.
Maybe the framework could take these groups and combine/group them into a single node with the groups colors.
There is still HSV approach [0] in store. One problem with proposed
implementation is fixed algorithm of RGB <-> HSV color space conversion.
Maybe allowing for some board specific adjustments in DT would add
more flexibility.
[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/31/255
Yes we could do HSV. Problem is that that we do not really have RGB
available. We do have integers for red, green and blue, but they do
not correspond to RGB colorspace.
OK, so conversion from HSV to RGB would only increase the aberration.
So, let's stick to RGB - we've got to have some stable ground and this
is something that the hardware at least pretends to be compliant
with.
I'm not saying that we should stick to RGB. I'm just saying that
problem is complex.
And no, hardware does not even pretend to be compliant with RGB color
model ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGB_color_model ). In
particular, in RGB there is non-linear brightness curve.
Quotation from the wiki page you referred to:
"RGB is a device-dependent color model: different devices detect or
reproduce a given RGB value differently, since the color elements (such
as phosphors or dyes) and their response to the individual R, G, and B
levels vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, or even in the same
device over time. Thus an RGB value does not define the same color
across devices without some kind of color management"
This claim alone leaves much room for the manufacturers to pretend that
their devices are compliant with RGB model.
And the documentation of the hardware the discussed driver is for
also refers to RGB model in many places - e.g. see Table 1, page 15
in the document [0], where mapping of output triplets to an RGB module
is shown.
One thing that I missed is that the discussed hardware provides
LEDn_BRIGHTNESS registers for each RGB LED module, that can be
configured to set color intensity in linear or logarithmic fashion.
Actually this stands in contradiction with RGB model, since
change of "color intensity" means change of all RGB components.
We could use brightness file as for monochrome LEDs for that,
but we'd need to come up with consistent interface semantics
for all devices, also those which don't have corresponding
functionality. Probably this is the place where we could apply
some RGB<->HSV conversion, as color intensity feels something
more of HSV's saturation and value.
It would be good to hear from Dan how that looks in reality
in case of lp5024 device.
Our problem is how to set the color atomically. With HSV approach we
were to obviate the problem by mapping brightness file to the "V"
component of that color space, and write all H,S and V values to the
hardware only on write to brightness file.
I'm not sure how realistic the "atomic color" problem is. Computers
are way faster than human vision.
With LEDn_BRIGHTNESS registers of lp5024 it seems that we need the
ability for grouping LEDs in triplets and be able to set their intensity
with a single write operation.
I believe problem to start with is the "white" problem. Setting
R=G=B=255 will _not_ result in anything close to white light on
hardware I have.
RGBW LED controllers solve this problem. For the devices without
white/amber we cannot do more than the hardware allows for.
[0] http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lp5024.pdf